Recently, there has been a renewed interest on the interplay between belief revision and general forms of reasoning. Argumentation represents a reasoning mechanism that is particularly apt for obtaining the consequences of a repository of potentially inconsistent and/or incomplete beliefs.
The area where the two research efforts have become confluent has produced a number of interesting results that show a promising opportunity to further our comprehension of the mechanisms involved in general patterns of reasoning. Clearly, the problems involved in this endeavor call for the participation of both communities.

In this context, we are pleased to announce the "Madeira Workshop on Belief Revision and Argumentation".